nisaba
Oh, it's not sticky-sticky, by that I merely meant that when shuffling or thumbing through the deck, the cards are not sliding over each other as easily as they used to do.
nigromancer700 said:Pleased to hear your mother is finding the deck fruitful to work with, Indigo Rose...
Good Wishes to all,
Nigel
nigromancer700 said:Sorry for my mistake, Indigo Rose and Ashtaroot. I meant that I was pleased Ashtaroot's mother found the deck fruitful and I hope your mother does too Indigo Rose! Thanks for the kind comments, I appreciate them.
One weird thing is that I am finding it hard, after the Rumi Tarot, to stop working in that Persian-Turkish-Mughal-inspired oriental style. That seems to be just carrying on...
All the Best,
Nigel
I don't find it easy to do conventional readings with, which is a problem when I have clients in front of me.olivia1 said:is this deck easy to read like the Fenestra? Im really eying this deck since it kind of remind me of the Fenestra but deeper. I just bought the Druidcraft and I decided that I dislike it ( I just cant connect with)
nisaba said:I don't find it easy to do conventional readings with, which is a problem when I have clients in front of me.
Where I *do* find it excels, is in offering food for thought: one or more cards pulled are worth serious consideration. I tend not to work off traditional Tarot knowledge with this deck, treating it more as an oracle and looking at the images plus reading the line of poetry. In fact, I consciously avoid as far as possible looking at the Tarot title and thinking ion terms of Tarot, and I find when I do that, it's a wonderful deck.