...I have been following an interesting Tarot group based on LGBT...an art group who are recreating the RW Archetypal characters by redressing them in alter gender clothing
I would agree with Rodney. There's only one "alter gender clothing" in your examples.
Traditionally - The Devil is "everything" is hir not?
(Baphomet is both sexes, I believe).
I don't see how putting hir in clothes makes any kind of flip. Infact, I think it detracts from the usual impact imo. Unless one is drawing a completely different type of Devil... like the one in Parallel Worlds Tarot - where it's actually a rather evil looking clown (in clown clothes) - but... he has hooves.
Would be interesting to see a bit more of the deck.
Putting The Fool in a dress - doesn't make any difference to the meaning for me (but then - I'm not particularly fixed on the "traditional gender" presented in tarot.
And how does putting the emperor in leathers emasculate him? Hmm. Interesting.
I suppose - it does make him sort-of less "rigid" in his outlook (as we are used to seeing him) - which of course might be "bending" (Lol - sorry - just saw the amusement in that word)
AN original view of him.
I have a couple of decks that do reverse some of the "traditional" gender imagery.
And you are right - during Pammy's time (Pamela Coleman Smith) alternate gender was prohibited. Your choice was prison or chemical alteration if you were found out.
...you will see with the Fool that some readers might interpret this card has being openly free with their sexuality i have often had this card to give me an indication of Bi-sexuality.
I hadn't thought about that (not come up yet probably) - but yes - that's one perfect interpretation. Thank you for drawing my attention to it.