- doesn't that almost automatically mean there would/could/should be a #2? Or maybe even more?I'm thinking this may the only factual thing other the historical and current events one can honestly say about tarot.
Given how folks feel about superlatives, it could just be "Tarot Fact" without any numbers or superlatives.(Arguing semantics here) But - but designating it as #1, - doesn't that almost automatically mean there would/could/should be a #2? Or maybe even more?
If there is no #2 - perhaps, then, it is 'The Ultimate Tarot Fact' ?
Anything can be denied, whether accurately or not."The Undeniable Tarot Fact"?
What do you think? View attachment 73901