MareSaturni
Hi everyone! I hope you are doing well!
I have been reading some books and a few times different authors mention that this or that planets, or that specific combination of planets, is the "signature" os an Astrologer in someone's map.
Donna Cunningham, for instance, mentions that one of the indicators of talent/potential to be an astrologer is to have both Uranus and Neptune must be strong in a prominent position (like close to the angles, I suppose). However, I am not sure because these planets are slow and 'social'... wouldn't their influence create a generation of astrologers?
Another book I read (sorry I cannot remember which - I should have kept notes!) related Astrology to Mercury, and not to Uranus. But it seems most of "modern" books really consider Uranus the "planet of the Astrologer", although they do not agree on how Uranus must be placed/aspected in order to show this particular potential.
So I'd like to ask people here, out of curiosity... what would you consider the "astrologer signature" in a natal chart? Or such things doesn't exist, in your view?
Thank you for sharing your ideas!
I have been reading some books and a few times different authors mention that this or that planets, or that specific combination of planets, is the "signature" os an Astrologer in someone's map.
Donna Cunningham, for instance, mentions that one of the indicators of talent/potential to be an astrologer is to have both Uranus and Neptune must be strong in a prominent position (like close to the angles, I suppose). However, I am not sure because these planets are slow and 'social'... wouldn't their influence create a generation of astrologers?
Another book I read (sorry I cannot remember which - I should have kept notes!) related Astrology to Mercury, and not to Uranus. But it seems most of "modern" books really consider Uranus the "planet of the Astrologer", although they do not agree on how Uranus must be placed/aspected in order to show this particular potential.
So I'd like to ask people here, out of curiosity... what would you consider the "astrologer signature" in a natal chart? Or such things doesn't exist, in your view?
Thank you for sharing your ideas!