noby
I'm happy to accept that perhaps I mininterpreted what was said; I would be much happier if that were true than for the alternative to be true.
But I don't see what was intended by all these statements if my interpretation is incorrect. It seems that what is being said is that there is a certain way women write about tarot, and this type of writing is so common that it is the norm, and that male readers do not have any resources which are inclusive of their perspectives. That's what I read, and I find such a claim absurd, and certainly hope it is not what was intended. If it indeed is not what is being said here, then what exactly is?
But I don't see what was intended by all these statements if my interpretation is incorrect. It seems that what is being said is that there is a certain way women write about tarot, and this type of writing is so common that it is the norm, and that male readers do not have any resources which are inclusive of their perspectives. That's what I read, and I find such a claim absurd, and certainly hope it is not what was intended. If it indeed is not what is being said here, then what exactly is?