Tanga
Thankyou.
The bit that really made me laugh was the title of the following youtube:
"Darth Vader goes to anger management". (just the title - didn't actually watch it).
I think that testing a potential canditate by not answering their messages is a bit lame. It may have been good practice back when these orders were actually secret and had to operate underground, but if the orders truly are more open these days, it just feels silly to me.
Back when I was practicing martial arts, our school welcomed everyone with open arms. The teachers knew there was no point in trying to test new student's mettle or dedication because the truth is in the pudding, so to speak.
And here's the thing, it's what we called "beginner's paradox". You don't know if a school or teacher is the right one for you unless you try it first. The initial silence doesn't help with this in any way.
Wow, some lovely though provoking replies from everyone.
Cards on the table here. I also teach what I do for a living. It even involves grades It fascinates me why some people can achieve great things and other drop out at some stage. With the potential drop outs I always see them falter first and at that point they are waving a massive flag "help- the normal system isn't working for me" to the teaching methods I'm using. This is when as a teacher I have to say, ok because the end game is more important than structured logical progression, I'm going to have to do things out of order because this is the right order for them, even if I know that it's going to complicate things. But as a teacher sometimes you have to trust what the pupil knows instinctively.
Some people metaphorically can use nunchucks before they can walk
Their potential end game might be better/worse than what I think their end game was going to be, but if you don't allow people full expression in the process, you'll always get clones.
Yes- I think 'testing' potential candidates is not only lame but a complete waste of their time. They might not have that long to live to wait a few months/years. 'Life is precious' and 'no time like the present'. I teach elderly people too and although they joke about it, you can see when they say "I want to learn this today" with earnestness that they have begun prioritizing things, so rigid teaching orders have to go out of the window. Any Order/organisation which doesn't realize this concept of time criticality isn't an order worth joining in my humble opinion because they just don't get one of the most important concepts in life. (Unless they have no spaces in which an immediate no and a suggestion of where else to go would be polite and decent. )
I agree with that mostly ... then again there are those mass of letters that are answered and no response back .... the arrangements made and no show up ... that is really annoying and time wasting exercise on the groups part . Or the continued delay or postponement ( a group of people bend over backwards to make it happen within the applicants framework and the applicant keep cancelling because of important issues ... to them ..... and then never show up
I know someone who was 'rushed through' ... against the rules ... the said the after effects were intense, confusing , jumbled and unsettling.
I agree with that mostly ... then again there are those mass of letters that are answered and no response back .... the arrangements made and no show up ... that is really annoying and time wasting exercise on the groups part . Or the continued delay or postponement ( a group of people bend over backwards to make it happen within the applicants framework and the applicant keep cancelling because of important issues ... to them ..... and then never show up
Putting my own cards down here, I was a trained initiator, and held a high position in an order (if you couldn't already tell ) , I was also both a school teacher for a while and a martial arts teacher. So I speak from my experience, they are all different fields.
I know someone who was 'rushed through' ... against the rules ... the said the after effects were intense, confusing , jumbled and unsettling. Its a bit like, what is happening to children nowadays, they are not getting enough time to settle into various stages before the next one is heaped upon them. Said person above had to spend just as much time anyway, catching up afterwards.
From reading all the posts there seems to be a general acknowledgement of the value of a mentoring role or discussion, but the main way of getting this seem to involve joining an organisation, and regardless of the difficulties that seem inherent in gaining membership, many people are not at their best in a group setting.
Alan Moore's character suggests 'finding a magician' to develop further along the path, but this seems harder done than said, but he is clearly advocating work outside of a society.
The options seem to be: to practice alone or join an organisation with a set curriculum.
When I began this thread I meant no criticism towards either model, and that remains.
that said, there seems to be a missing middle ground where people pursuing this path can meet for face to face discussions as Barleywine mentions.
Tanga's approaching small reading groups, reads to me, as an attempt to achieve a similar thing.
I am fairly sure I would be stifled in a group of 'closet thespians' simply because that is not a medium of learning I would be comfortable with, (okay, for me it sounds like hell!)
but that does not mean I, or any other hermetic practicioner, is any less committed or earnest in their learning.
From the thread it seems apparent some people are happy working in an organisation and really appreciate the benefits, whilst others might be put off for several reasons; elitism, the difficulties faced by some in trying to join, and secrecy around the curriculum being examples cited.
What I am wandering is, can this gap be closed?
We are no longer under the oppression of the Victorian era, nor is esotercism as taboo as once it was. we live in what people are calling 'the age of information' and yet the options of learning this art seem at the moment to be restrictive and prescriptive.
I have seen one magician on you tube who takes on an apprentice, but on the whole sharing and helping outside of an order seems very hard to come by.
there are groups meeting all over the world to discuss the most banal of subjects, education is becoming more and more diverse in its ways of delivering information, but magick and tarot seems far behind in embracing the possibilities today can offer.
this is said with an understanding of the reservations of teaching outside of a structure (nobody wants to be responsible for a Darth Vader), but the option to jointly follow or create a path, outside of an order, seems to be something a lot of people might benefit from?
given the nature of the work, to have 'one kindred spirit for face to face discussion' could greatly benefit aspirants and would allow people wider options to meet their preferred way of learning.
Crowley makes much of the unique individual perspective and the scheme for development he made public, but the idea of a little worthwhile company along the way seems a gap for many people.
do societies aid or encourage their members to act as envoys, to share their knowledge with non-members? the quote from Lon about the secrets being more about the timing of their delivery being suited to the level of the learner, might be more effectively judged in a one-to-one role?
Outside of that question, most prominent people in esotericism, if wanting to pass on their learning, seem to create their own societies, and so seem to perpetuate the rebuilding of the same wheel (perhaps with good reason?)
And yet, gauging by this thread, some people would prefer to forge their own path, but with a bit of company and discussion. (the path less walked being the path of genius etc)
ET is a valuable forum and community and perhaps scratches an itch in the absence of 'face-to-face discussions with a kindred spirit' and by its existence shows that a community exists.
So, I was wandering what people thought about:
can and should societies offer mentors to the uninitiated?
how can face-to-face discussion be facilitated outside of societies?
Or are societies a tried and trusted means and there because they work?
do societal attitudes still make people wary of openly embracing esotercism?
With more and more decks being produced, Wicca being the largest growing religion in the UK, and so many esoteric books popping up on the market, maybe the 'behind closed doors' age is passing and we can embrace more diverse ways of practice?
Lon, in his Thoth book, says that societies are not for everyone and that most of the stuff is out there. that given, from contributions to this thread, a little like minded face-to-face discusion could go a long way?
I am genuinely curious why such a valued and important 'art' continues to be kept underground, and whether this is deemed right for the protection of its community? or do people think it is failing to adapt to the possibilities of modern times.
Al was of the view that people should be taught tarot as early as possible, and maybe with a demystification of esotericism it could become, in time, part of mainstream curriculums? (yeah....I'm a dreamer.....but I'm not the only one.)
You've covered the ground thoroughly and thoughtfully. I've always had the impression that the Age of Enlightenment turned the uninformed masses against anything that can't be rendered in the terms of "hard science." That and the long-standing religious interdiction, even if that seems to be more perceived than implicit. The general public has been encouraged to ridicule, on one hand, and fear, on the other, anything that can't be engaged by the five senses (unless, of course, it's coming from the priestly class).
Threre are modern tools for reaching out to other aspirants of a group-minded persuasion. Meet-up is a good one that I used for a while, casting my net within a 50-mile radius of my location to see what, if anything is going on locally. Not finding anything pertinent within 25 miles or so, I tried hosting my own Meet-up group (the cost is nominal) but that fizzled due to lack of interest as well. Now I prowl the bookstores (or at least the only local one that caters to "our" type) to see what might pop up on the bulletin boards. The only thing I've found is the occasional lecture or "psychic fair," which is mainly a venue for people selling their readings (who don't really have the time or inclination to chat "off the meter"). We used to have an astrology group going here in "hippie-dom" (aka southern Vermont) 30 years ago, but the leader and a couple of the "prime movers" left the area and the rest have scattered. Seems the "New Age blush" has gone off the rose; it turned out to be something of a "False Spring" or "Piscean Pipe-dream" anyway <grumbles and goes in search of more coffee> . . .
This describes my one and only experience of occult initiation. (IIRC, I was in contact with you, ravenest, at the time - you might remember.) The organisation in question was comprised mostly of people of such advanced years that they had reached a point where they were pushing really hard to get me and some other younger initiates moving quickly through the grades. The resulting sense of desperation was palpable and very unsettling.
As it turned out, my journey was mismanaged so badly - by myself as well as the so-called "mentors" in the organisation, but I had no guidance so was bound to step awry - that the after effects were, as ravenest said, confusing, frightening and intensely counterproductive. After months of nightmares, broken meditation, depression and constant confusion, I walked away from not only the organisation, but all occult studies, including Tarot. That was...four? years ago? Or so. I'm just now feeling somewhat recovered...but extremely gun-shy.
I'm working up to contacting a different organisation, now. I hope that this time it goes better.
...Some groups ask that new members begin the process of acquiring a small number of books for study. The catch is that they have to be actual physical books. (The magical link? )
"But they're all free on the internet!!! Why should I have to pay for books? Waaaahhhh!!!"
Those who are really interested will find the money and buy the books.