delinfrey
Actually, the fact that nothing is changed, is a little bit annoying to me as a collector.
It is an immensely subjective issue, and in no way is meant as a criticism to the authors, but - last year, I was also a bit surprised when the 2nd edition was given out, that you just add a few drops of paint, change the backing, and call it the 2nd edition. Me as a collector - I gotta get it. But it is still essentially the same deck, so now you make me feel as if you just have a clever way to make money.
Or decks with "one different card" (Prisma Visions instantly comes to mind) - oh dear how I love that deck, but should I really purchase an entire deck (costing me about 80 dollars to get it) just to use one different card?
I think if you own the first edition, you should be able to purchase the new cards in single format, so you would be able to substitute, if you feel like it.
Wild Unknown was particularly evil in that should I wish to substitute only one of the cards, but use the 1st edition for the other altered cards, I cannot.
It is an immensely subjective issue, and in no way is meant as a criticism to the authors, but - last year, I was also a bit surprised when the 2nd edition was given out, that you just add a few drops of paint, change the backing, and call it the 2nd edition. Me as a collector - I gotta get it. But it is still essentially the same deck, so now you make me feel as if you just have a clever way to make money.
Or decks with "one different card" (Prisma Visions instantly comes to mind) - oh dear how I love that deck, but should I really purchase an entire deck (costing me about 80 dollars to get it) just to use one different card?
I think if you own the first edition, you should be able to purchase the new cards in single format, so you would be able to substitute, if you feel like it.
Wild Unknown was particularly evil in that should I wish to substitute only one of the cards, but use the 1st edition for the other altered cards, I cannot.