Minderwiz
You are quite right in terms of any factual evidence relating to a birth, that could then be used to erect a natal chart. In a real sense, Jesus the myth was never born. Jesus the person (assuming for the moment that there was such a person,) could have been born on any day over a number of years - cerrtainly a few more years than the period that was quoted earlier in the thread. We have no empiricl evidence of a biblcal style nativity and no empirical evidence of a biblical style crucifixion. Historical references to the latter are clearly hearsay. That doesn't invalidate the gospels at all I tend to treat mythic truth as just as real as empirical evidence.
Yes, I'm sure that many believers would go along with the argument that the heavens were arranged by God and therefore only confirm Jesus divinity to the extent that God (including JC) chose so to do. We will never settle this argument because it is incapable of empirical proof one way or the other.
It's a matter of belief, not a matter of fact.
Yes, I'm sure that many believers would go along with the argument that the heavens were arranged by God and therefore only confirm Jesus divinity to the extent that God (including JC) chose so to do. We will never settle this argument because it is incapable of empirical proof one way or the other.
It's a matter of belief, not a matter of fact.