euripides
I have been thinking about this and it reconfirmed (as if reconfirmation was needed) as to the almost unique relationship of the art of tarot and the tool of tarot. While one strives to consider the implications of every aspect of an image knowing that it will be studied in detail, it is nevertheless impossible to cover the infinite varieties of interpretation that will result. Nevertheless, feedback such as your interpretation can be extremely useful. Clearly to accommodate every suggestion and preference is futile and even if attempted would result in a "design by committee" blandness.
This is very important - I think while valuing feedback, trusting your own instincts is vital. It's the unique viewpoint and expression that makes each deck have its own special voice.
While tradition should be respected, it shouldn't be a straightjacket. Readers will inevitably bring their own baggage to the deck anyway, good and bad.
The other day I commented on a reading with the Gilded 'World' card, and for me it was a great deal removed from the interpretation that I might have given that card in any other deck; but there's an internal consistency within the deck itself.
In the future I expect to see readings which use cards drawn from both decks! How interesting to see the relationship between the old cards and the new - what's changed, what has stayed the same!