I'm sorry but I really struggle to take all this 'indigo children', 'crystal children' 'you are so special because you've been drawn to this book/course/healing system' New Age 'channelled' blurb even remotely seriously.
Replacing one set of dogmas for another and refusing to acknowledge the downs as well as the ups (in his renaming "to eliminate the negative energies of hierarchy, exclusion, judgment, and sacrifice") is not, to me anyway, what the tarot is supposed to be about. Where's the balance in making the deck entirely positive? What happens when something negative happens in your life? You just ignore it?? No, you have to deal with it and the regular cards can often help you to see a way through the bad times. How could such an imbalanced deck do that?
As for the art itself, yes, I agree with Little Buddha, the Empress card is fabulous, but the rest, to be honest, felt rather emotionless to me. I didn't get any great sense of energy from the imagery and I think there are far more lively and inspiring decks being created by people on this forum.
I don't often say much on the forum, and normally would never consider criticising someone else's work because art is such a personal thing but the grand claims being made for this deck, the text's talking down to the reader, and constant insistence that the 'old' card meanings are wrong/deceptive/destructive just got my back up, I suppose.
I don't doubt that there are a few spiritual insights to be taken from it but nothing that can't be realised or been around in many, many other books for a long time.
edited to say - as for the poetry.... *shudders*