a bit long-winded, sorry...
This thread inspired me to take out my copy of this deck, and have another look... It was actually one of the first Tarots I ever got, but I think it's probably been a few years now since I last used it.
The verdict: I still like it, even though it's WONKY!
I think that says a lot, seeing as my taste in decks has done a complete 180 since I first started out, and I usually reach for historical decks, nowadays.
I bought this deck because I loooooved the beautiful images, and I still do. Every single card is so amazingly gorgeous, and the art is very consistant in style and color palette, and always very skillfully rendered. There is not a single card that looks out of place in comparison to the others, or like any of them were painted in too much of a hurry. It really looks like the artist took the time to really feel every card, and make it beautiful.
I like how swirly and flowy the cards are.. the images blend into one another beautifully in a spread.
I also generally like the keywords, which is quite the accomplishment, since normally I HATE words on the cards, and will usually clip off ones with too many words or titles.
These keywords, however, have a kind of poetic air about them.. one could combine them in a reading to make expressive little affirmation-like poems.
Here are 3 I just pulled, for example:
"Receiving Grace,
Natural Intimacy,
Dissolving into Oneness."
How lovely!
Now, here's the iffy part... these really seem more oracle-like to me, than Tarot, which may or may not be to someone's liking.
For most of the minor arcana, there is nothing whatsoever to relate the cards to any sort of traditional system. In addition to not depicting suit symbols in the imagery (which I think is ok, actually, it's part of the strength of the images), they also don't generally convey any kind of 'generally accepted' meaning for most of the cards. For example, the 8 of cups is called "human doing" and shows the silhouette of a figure in front of a conveyor belt carrying a baby, with a cityscape in the background. A powerful image, and an interesting concept, but why is this the 8 of cups? Another is the 7 of wands, which they've titled 'opening to angels'. The picture shows a woman with arms outstretched, touching the hand of a large, shimmery-glowy angel figure. Again, it's lovely, but why the 7 of wands?
I thought maybe they just had their own structure, but after laying out each of the numbers, ace to 10, and comparing them across the suits, I can't see any common underlying structure, (ie: number doesn't seem to play a role in the meaning of many of the cards). In addition, the suits don't even seem to carry a particular meaning, right across the board.. A few of the cards have RWS/Golden Dawn type meanings, but most don't.
The court cards also have all been retitled (server, teacher, healer, master), and I'm not sure which are supposed to correspond to what, if there even was an intended correspondance.
If one were to clip off titles and color-coded borders, there is NO way that they would be able to tell even which suit a card belongs to, let alone which one it is in particular. Actually, they probably wouldn't even be able to tell that it was a Tarot image at all, if they didn't know.... I think this is part of the reason I like the keywords in this deck; they help to anchor the images a bit to some particular idea.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think everything HAS to line up with a particular set of esoteric correspondances, but I -do- like when there is some sort of underlying structure to the cards, and these don't seem to really have one.
(I should point out though, that my copy of the accompanying book is currently on another continent, so perhaps they've written something in there about suit or number that I've missed from my own visual ponderings..)
I find it interesting in this deck to see how my own ideas of each card fit into the way they have chosen to depict them/title them.. sometimes they mesh very well into each other (I like the idea of the two of swords as 'creative differences', the 10 of swords as 'leaving the story', and the 4 of disks as 'manifesting home'!), and some of them don't dovetail quite so neatly, but that's part of what makes it interesting!
I think this is a great deck for meditation/contemplation/creating affirmations/examining one's spiritual path, or perhaps for using with someone who is made uncomfortable by more standard types of Tarot decks (all the imagery in this one is peaceful and pretty, the keywords are pleasant, and there isn't much 'scary' in here.), but I don't think it would do for many other types of card-reading. It's probably not what I'd reach for if I wanted to do a predictive reading about financial problems, for example, unless I wanted to look at the emotional, psychological, or spiritual implications of them.