A historical theory about the meaning of tarot must explain the order of the sequence, as well as the images and their traditional names.
I must agree with you on this point. My historical theory must explain the order of the sequence as well as the images and their traditional names. At this point I have not given a detailed reason for the order or the sequence of the images, why the images appear as they do, and why the traditional names of the 22 Major Arcana are not identical with the names of the constellations that I suggest that the Tarot cards represent.
Why should Sagittarius be represented as Death (with a scythe, in most cases) and named "La Morte" ("Death")? It is clearly simpler (and hence more correct) to interpret the card as an allegory of Death.
How you interpret the Death card is your business and if you prefer to interpret it as an allegory of Death, then please do so.
Why the so-called Death card is a portrayal of the constellation Sagittarius the Archer is complicated, but looking at an early picture of the Death card in the Visconti-Sforza deck notice that there is no title and no sickle, but the skeleton man holds a bow:
File:Visconti-sforza-13-death.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Visconti-sforza-13-death.jpg
It might have been easier to depict Sagittarius without a horse because of the size of the card, but that problem was solved by making the image smaller. During that period of time the concept of death and time as well as its iconography was undergoing change, and the sickle became a popular symbol associated with Death. Previously the sickle was seen in the constellation Leo.
Hello Cartomancer, would you please answer my question and provide a few examples of the Sagittarius constellation holding a scythe as in
”Charles VI” Death card?
Perhaps we should choose a deck to argue about. My assertion is that the earlier Tarot decks such as the Visconte-Sforza deck's Major Arcana more closely portrayed constellations than later decks, although there are many examples of modern knowledge of the constellation connection to the Tarot as evidenced by the portrayal of the Hierophant and the Hermit in the Waite-Smith deck as Bootes and Ophiuchus in the Julius Schiller star atlas: Coelum stellatum Christianum.
Would you also please answer my other question: why was trump XIII known as La Morte (Death) and not “Sagittarius”?
This is a good question that probably has many answers. I believe that the names such as Death, Justice, etc. are metaphors or symbols for the constellation names. Many people associate the Justice card, a woman with balance scales, with the constellation Libra. How would you fit the name "Sagittarius" on a small card when you could simply write "Death"? But stretching the number of letters in the Popess card to "High Priestess" is a big graphic enlargement of the title. Some of the early Tarot trumps had no name or number, so did everybody know their name or number or was it left to their imaginations?
It is perfectly clear to me that you do not agree with the meaning that renaissance Italians attributed to Tarot. What is not clear to me is which criteria “better support” constellations than allegories when explaining the trumps. It is not so much a matter of “believing” and “faith”, it is more a matter of considering the facts. I am happy you are creating a set of trumps inspired to constellations, this seems to me a valuable project, but why is it necessary to impose your personal inspiration as “the original meaning of the trumps”?
Actually, I don't know much about the Renaissance Italian Tarot attributions. I appreciate that you have reviewed my attributions of a set of trumps as traditional constellations and found it a worthy project. I hope to add more mock-ups of the trumps and an index in a new thread.
It is also true that I should provide "better support" for constellations as the origin of the Tarot Trumps, but I don't expect you to accept my thesis on faith or belief. I do expect to provide facts, but then we will have to come to some kind of agreement about what information can be considered facts. Personally, I think that graphics and art are a good indicator of facts as well as early writings about the subject, although all of that would be subject to investigation and verification. In regard to my imposing my personal inspiration about "the original meaning of the trumps", I understand that my viewpoint may be unpopular, but there are many people with strong opinions on this and other forums that by taking a stand on a matter or issue gets discussed more. I appreciate your poking holes in my thesis, but somehow you are strengthening my arguments by making me explain myself more adequately.
For instance, let's consider:
The Visconti-Sforza Death card
The Vienna Sagittarius
The Palermo allegory of Death (1440 ca)
Code:
VSDeath Constellation Allegory
The subject is a centaur N Y N
The subject is decomposed Y N Y
The subject has a bow Y Y Y
The only similarity between the Constellation and the Visconti Sforza trump is the bow. While the Palermo allegory represents
the skeleton of a person with a bow, just as in the trump.
I think that the bow connection is key. How the constellation Sagittarius became a skeleton in the Death cards might be explained by the fact that Sagittarius lies in the Milky Way and that the intersection of the Milky Way and the ecliptic in Sagittarius is one of the Gates of Mem, the gateway to death. Mem in Hebrew means:
The Phoenician and Paleo-Hebrew form of Mem is a wavy line with the meaning of "water". The Hebrew letter Mem can be seen in the constellation Sagittarius as a symbol for "water".
The other gate is Cancer, the entry portal, the gate of birth.
Why is there a crown in many of the Death cards? That crown below the horseman is Corona Australis, the Southern Crown. I'd be interested if a box or lighthouse has appeared in any of the Death cards as the ancient Greek Aratus saw a lighthouse in the nearby constellation Ara.
If we consider the larger context of the
Palermo Fresco, we see other details: Death is defeating a large number of people, who represent all humanity, including a Pope and an Emperor. This is exactly what happens in Tarot: Death (XIII) defeats (trumps) the Emperor (IV) and the Pope (V). We see this not only in the trump sequence, but also in some single death cards, such as the above mentioned
”Charles VI”. Can you see the corpses under Death's black horse?
Yes, I see the corpses under Death's black horse. The death images provided are a compelling indication that the sickle became a symbol of death. I believe that Corona Australis represents the crown of royalty, whom you see as the Emperor. The nearby constellation Ara may offer a connection to clergy or the church or the Pope in a Death card.
In
one of the posts I linked, Michael Hurst presents an illustration from Petrarch's Trionfi poem. The image represents Death defeating a large number of people (including a Pope, an Emperor and a Fool). Michael explains that the three layers of the picture (bottom to top) correspond to
the three sections of the trump sequence: the Ranks of Mankind (0-V), an allegory of human life (VI-XIII), afterlife, i.e. an eschatolocial narration (XIV-XXI) such as that we find in the Book of Revelation.
I can concede that some of the Tarot trump cards were illustrated with allegorical and theological images, but I insist those images were associated with constellations in some way.
In one of the links you provided I found this quote: "In A Wicked Pack of Cards, Ronald Decker, Thierry Depaulis, and Michael Dummett put it this way: “The test of whether a coded text has been correctly deciphered is that it allows a coherent message to be read.” (Page 250.)"
I suggest that the Tarot trumps are a code that can be deciphered in a number of ways. We must look at the trumps for what they picture. What you see is what you get. The code can be understood as a sequence of constellations that are portrayed in the Tarot trumps. Why the trumps and their corresponding constellations are in the order they are in is a long story that is best explained in the Kabbalah and Alphabets section.
Currently, your Constellation theory fails to explain:
* the details in the single cards (only matching a few details, such as the bow of Death/Sagittarius). Charles XVI Death card has absolutely nothing to do with Sagittarius. The skeleton, the scythe, the black horse and the corpses are not associated in any way with Sagittarius, but are common in allegories of Death;
* the traditional names of the cards (as far as I know, no card ever brought the name of a constellation, with the only accidental exception of "il carro");
* the meaning of the trump sequence.
I think you can claim that you have a theory which is “better supported” than the moral allegory interpretation only if you can provide better explanations for all the three points above.
Please help me to better understand what needs to be explained better as three points:
1. Constellation theory needs to explain "the details in the single cards ..."
This could be a fascinating discussion about constellational details that can be seen in the trumps, such as the crown under the horse in the Death card. For the most part the images seen in the early cards match the area of the sky they are seen.
2. Constellation theory needs to explain "the traditional names of the cards (as far as I know, no card ever brought the name of a constellation, with the only accidental exception of "il carro")";
"il carro" refers to the Chariot card, which is the exception of the application of a constellation's name to a Tarot trump. I assert that "il carro" is not an accidental exception, but it was one of the cards that had its name carry from constellation to Tarot trump. But "il carro" could refer to any cart or chariot can't it? Attributing the Chariot card to the constellation Auriga the Charioteer is logical. And if one card's name carried through from its constellation origin, what names might be attributed to earlier decks if card names for the trumps are even used. When were names for the trumps first used?
3. Constellation theory needs to explain "the meaning of the trump sequence".
The trump sequence is based on a sequence of constellations used to create the Phoenician alphabet, the Mayan Day Names, counting systems, navigation systems, and calendar systems. It is beyond the scope of this post to explain all of that, I hope to offer information about these matters in future posts.
Some of these points that require an adequate explanation by me should be done in a sequence a step at a time or, more succinctly, a card at a time. There are easy cards to explain as constellations, but some are best pictured by using allegorical or theological images that closely simulate the actual constellations, which one of the reasons we may have a different perspective in this matter. I will have to agree with you that allegorical images contributed to the Tarot trumps, but those images helped personify or exemplify the constellations in the sequence. However, it is probably better to address some of the easier trump images first.
Thanks for asking interesting questions.
-Cartomancer