nord_drache
Here's a question to our community . . . If we get a deck that may have not been well known, seems unusual or even new, should we take the time to give a review - even checking if there is an existing thread and reply to it.
I think the answer is yes.
My reasoning is that . . .
First it helps people make a sound decision when spending possibly limited funds on new decks.
Secondly through exposure people might discover new tools that may be even more effective for them.
There is a chance it might also help small publishers to continue to grow. Good reviews means that might not be ignored because they aren't the main stream larger publishers.
Your answer and opinions why are as always appreciated.
Jim
I think the answer is yes.
My reasoning is that . . .
First it helps people make a sound decision when spending possibly limited funds on new decks.
Secondly through exposure people might discover new tools that may be even more effective for them.
There is a chance it might also help small publishers to continue to grow. Good reviews means that might not be ignored because they aren't the main stream larger publishers.
Your answer and opinions why are as always appreciated.
Jim