moderndayruth said:
Can it be agreed that there is difference in viewpoints or all the members here have absolutely to agree on one given option?
Sure. Everyone is entitled to have their opinions and do whatever they want. I don't recall saying otherwise, but since it must be stated, here it is.
moderndayruth said:
What i would like to know (and probably many here) is what exactly prompt you to start the thread?
A personal experience or impressions from the Forum?
Many blood chilling examples have been given - where are those from?
From real life or from Your Readings forum here? If its the latter, its easily ignored.
I am not going to play this game. I prefer not to give name nor face to examples I chose, all I can tell you is that they exist and that you may find them easily enough in any divination forum that has a part of it devoted to practice. To post links would be extremely unconsiderate towards the people that have prompted me to start this post.
I also have taken some examples from real life, but most come from the forums I am a member of, as stated in the first post of this thread.
moderndayruth said:
Most of our members are literate and quite eloquent too, if most of us miss the point here, maybe the point isn't clear or it wasn't verbalized properly?
Perhaps. I'm already planning to enroll in a English course to fix that.
moderndayruth said:
Basically what i am trying to say - is that every opinion is based on one own life experience and that over-simplifications and generalizations are not the way to make an objective appraisal.
A bit of generalization is necessary in discussion or there'll be no discussion at all. That said, a discussion is just theory, I am not torturing and burning people who think or act differently from me. I'm just disagreeing with their overall idea, not with them personally.
moderndayruth said:
Perpetually telling someone how to live their lives, what to believe in, what questions to asks, what not asks, what to do with their own time and Tarot decks - its exactly that, patronizing, because we believe we are better and wiser than them.
I have not done such thing. I asked a question.
moderndayruth said:
As a journalist and more so, as a MA to be, you know its useful (even necessary) to list your source of information.
Where have you noticed these occurrences? Are you absolutely persuaded that these people do not have any kind of interactions with the subjects of their readings?
As a journalist, I have to protect my sources from negative attention, and not expose them unecessarily. This is not an investigation, it's a goddamned post about tarot reading. Please.
moderndayruth said:
Or we'll imply our own (mis)understanding of Faith on them too?
To not have a religion is not a misunderstading of faith.
Most importantly, you took my quote completely out of context. I was talking about the expression "leap of faith", not about faith itself.
moderndayruth said:
What's the oppisite of acting foolishly? Acting wisely, no?
Since when foolishness became an ideal to strive for?
I never said that. You keep putting words in my mouth.
If you want to know what I meant about foolishness, you have but to read the meaning of the unnumbered card of the Major Arcana. It'll tell you everything you need to know about the many different facets of foolishness.
[I edited this last paragraph to avoid confusion, since it was not my intention to call anyone a fool.]
moderndayruth said:
The above hardly sounds as a question, its a judgment and evaluation that contains in itself the answers to all the questions it allegedly asks, excluding by its mere formulation the co-existence of another points of view.
Not everyone seems to agree with you. Many people have answered to my post like the question it is meant to be, and were not offended by the idea exposed.
You are doing the same thing you have accused me of doing.