The crowned one
Alissa said:I probably already mentioned this in this thread (too long ago to remember) but the thing that gets me is this...
...If time is not linear, then karma is not linear.
And this concept continues to blow my mind, because karma is pretty much based off linear thinking (cause -> effect). So when karma becomes non-linear, what happens? Are we paying back "bad karma" that we haven't even accumluated? Are we reaping the benefits of "good karma" by actions we haven't even taken?
Blows. My. Mind.
And I love that.
linear, that means ( basically) event to event...so karma stays linear.
Time? What I wonder about is if nothing changes and I mean "nothing" does time exist, or does it come into existence the instant the change takes place...so we can now measure the event Everyone agrees you DO need events to measure time.. Lets remember time(flow) is a metaphor. Is the past real? (still).
As far as Tollaksen goes, it is very interesting but not too new of an idea Is'ent this all based off Aharonov's work? I have no opinion just interest in following his and a few other camps at a magizine level of understanding.