jackdaw*
I think your advice comes too late, Gregory. See the other thread about which version to buy ...
Got it!gregory said:You can spell, but your smilies need work
This thread has never once worked on me...Galatea said:I thank all of you for your excellent and highly professional attempts to de-enable me! I regret having to announce that I am one of the lost cases of this thread, and have now posted a thread on which version to buy.... But don´t be too sad about it, you can never save them all !
QueenofPentacles said:I tried to make a Tarot bag. Once. It looks like a little white satin potato sack. I have next to no sewing abilities can't even sew a button back on to make it stay there.
In that this is a de-enabling thread, I opted to keep my very positive views of the Maat Tarot to myself. That said, I have decided it is appropriate for me to provide another take on the quality of the deck's cardstock. While I respect QoP's opinions, I really disagree with the expressed assessment of Maat Tarot's cardstock. I think it is absolutely extraordinary!QueenofPentacles said:Talk you out of the Maat, you say?
- too big to be comfortably usable.
- very expensive.
- flimsy cardstock.
- some very disturbingly bloody cards (Three and Ten of Swords, for example)
- very focused on childbirth and motherhood as the be-all and end-all. If that is not your own deeply-felt belief, those cards will really annoy you.
- book's font is hard to read.
- artist's name/copyright year - NOT a signature, but computer-generated - prominent on the bottom of each card. It's a little distracting.